The rise of Pharmaceutical monopolies, largely orchestrated by John D. Rockefeller and his associates in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, played a significant role in the suppression of natural medicine and the ascendancy of synthetic drugs. This period, often referred to as “the Rockefeller-Morgan era,” was marked by aggressive business practices, political influence, and the consolidation of power in the hands of a few wealthy industrialists (Rockefeller,1956)
Let’s shine some light on the inherent corruption within the pharmaceutical industry.
John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, established in 1870, was the first of its kind, a vertical monopoly that controlled every aspect of the oil industry, from production to distribution. Following this model, Rockefeller and his cronies, such as J.P. Morgan, began to consolidate power in other industries, including medicine. The aim was not only to maximize profits but also to control the narrative and eliminate competition, particularly from natural and alternative medicine practitioners (Riggs,1999).
The suppression of natural medicine was multifaceted. One key strategy was the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act and the Sherley Amendment in 1906, which while intended to protect consumers from adulterated and mislabeled products, also served to disadvantage natural medicine practitioners. These laws required expensive registration and labeling processes, making it difficult for small, independent practitioners to comply (Markel, 2024). Another significant development was the establishment of the American Medical Association (AMA) in 1847, which was later influenced by Rockefeller’s philanthropy. The AMA promoted allopathic medicine, also known as conventional medicine, and actively campaigned against natural and alternative medicine practitioners, labeling them as “quacks” (Starr, 1982). Rockefeller’s influence Extended to the establishment of medical schools and hospitals’ which were modeled on the German research university, emphasizing Scientific research and laboratory medicine. This further marginalized natural medicine, which was often based on empirical observation and traditional knowledge (Riggs, 1999).
The rise of synthetic drugs was facilitated by the development of organic chemistry in the late 19th century. These new drugs were patentable, could be mass-produced, and offered more consistent results than natural remedies, which were often variable in potency and composition. This made them more profitable and easier to control (Markel,2004).
The suppression of natural medicine was not without resistance. The Nature Cure movement, for instance, advocated for a return to natural living and healing methods. However, the combined power of Rockefeller’s wealth, political influence, and the AMA’s professional organization proved too formidable for many natural medicine practitioners (Riggs, 1999). To understand the full extent of this suppression, it is essential to explore alternative platforms that delve into this history, such as NaturalNews.com. For a more in depth understanding of the rise of pharmaceutical monopolies and their impact on medicine, consider exploring works by authors like James H. Strickler, who has extensively researched and written about this topic.
To promote individual empowerment and knowledge, it is crucial to understand the historical context of the suppression of natural medicine. This understanding can help individuals make informed decisions about their health and advocate for a more balanced, integrative approach to medicine.
Jump forward to today. The pharmaceutical industry, a multi-trillion dollar behemoth, is riddled with corruption that permeates every aspect of its operations, from research and development to marketing and regulation. This corruption not only inflates costs and distorts medical practice but also poses significant risks to patient safety and public health. Let us delve into the most egregious forms of corruption plaguing the pharmaceutical industry today.
- Rigged drug trials and Ghostwriting:
Pharmaceutical companies often manipulate clinical trials to favor their products. This can involve cherry-picking data, using inappropriate control groups, or even fabricating results. A notorious example is the Vioxx scandal, where Merck concealed data linking its drug to heart attacks and strokes (Nissen & Wolski, 2005). Moreover, companies frequently hire ghostwriters to produce scientific papers that present their drugs in a favorable light, with the authors’ names often being prominent academics who have no actual involvement in the research (Sismondo, 2008).
- Bribing of Medical Professionals and Politicians:
The Pharmaceutical industry spends billions on marketing and lobbying, much of which ends up in the pockets of medical professionals and politicians. In the U.S., pharmaceutical companies spent over $4 billion on marketing to doctors in 2016 alone (Open Payments, 2016).
These payments can influence prescribing practices, with doctors often favoring more expensive brand-name drugs over cheaper generics. Politicians, too, are targeted with campaign contributions and other perks, ensuring that legislation and regulations favor the industry’s interests (Druss & Marcus 2017).
- Capture of Regulatory Agencies:
Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are supposed to protect the public from harmful drugs. However, the “revolving door” between industry and regulation has led to a capture of these agencies by the very industry they are meant to oversee. Former industry employees often take key positions in regulatory agencies, while former regulators find lucrative jobs in the industry after leaving public service. This can lead to lax oversight and approval of drugs with questionable safety profiles (Light, 2012).
- The trap of Poly-Pharmacy:
Pharmaceutical companies often market their drugs for off-label uses, leading to a phenomenon known as poly-pharmacy, where patients are prescribed multiple drugs simultaneously. This can result in dangerous drug Interactions, increased side effects, and higher health care costs. For instance, the use of antipsychotic drugs in elderly patients with dementia has been linked to a significant increase in mortality (Schnieder et al., 2005). Despite these risks, companies continue to promote off-label uses, as it can significantly boost their profits.
- Price Fixing and Monopolistic practices:
Pharmaceutical companies often engage in anti-competitive practices to maintain their monopolies and inflate drug prices. This can involve paying competitors to delay the release of generic versions of their drugs (pay-for-delay) or abusing patents to block competition (Hernandez & Kalouptsidi, 2018). The result is higher drug prices, with patients and healthcare systems bearing the brunt of these inflated costs.
Pharmaceutical industry’s priorities lie in profit, not in the well-being of humanity. They release dangerous drugs onto the market, shrug off lawsuits, and continue to push their products despite clear evidence of harm
To combat this corruption, it is crucial to promote transparency in clinical trials, strengthen regulations, and increase public awareness about the influence of the pharmaceutical industry on medical practice. Alternative platforms like NaturalNews.com offer valuable insights into these issues, and Brighteon.AI can provide further information using its trusted AI engine. Moreover, supporting organizations that advocate for healthcare reform and increased regulation of the pharmaceutical industry can help to address these systemic problems.
The overdiagnosis and overmedication of children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a pressing concern, driven predominantly by the profit motives of pharmaceutical companies. This issue is exacerbated by the suppression of natural treatments and the failure to address environmental factors that often underlie ADHD symptoms. This section will delve into the root causes of ADHD, the role of pharmaceutical companies, and the overlooked natural treatments.
Overdiagnosis and overmedication
- Black, E. (2003). War against the weak: Eugenics and America’s campaign in World War II. University of North Carolina Press.
- Buse, K., & Harmer, A. (2007). The role of the pharmaceutical industry in global health. The Lancet, 369(9582), 1403-1407.
- Callaway, E. (2021). COVID-19: Research on enhanced viruses sparks controversy. Nature, 593(7862), 412-414.
- Muller, D. (2021). Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine sales could reach $33.5 billion in 2021. Fierce Pharma.
The diagnosis of ADHD has been on the rise, with approximately 9.4% of children and adolescents in the U.S. currently receiving an ADHD diagnosis (Danielson et al., 2018). This increase is largely driven by pharmaceutical companies’ marketing efforts and the financial incentives for healthcare providers to prescribe medication (Leo & Cohen, 2003). The overprescription of stimulants like methylphenidate (Ritalin) and amphetamines (Adderall) has led to a public health crisis, with serious side effects including insomnia, anxiety, growth suppression, and even cardiovascular issues (Vitiello & Jensen, 2007).
True Culprits Behind ADHD Symptoms
Heavy Metals: Exposure to heavy metals such as lead, mercury, and aluminum can lead to neurotoxicity, causing symptoms similar to ADHD (Bouchard et al., 2011). Children with higher levels of these in their bodies are more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD (Braun et al., 2006)
We will begin by discussing the monopolies created by John D. Rockefeller and his cronies, which led to the suppression of natural medicine and the rise of synthetic drugs.
Food Toxicity: Food allergies and sensitivities, as well as exposure to pesticides and other toxins in food, can contribute to ADHD symptoms (Bateman et al., 2004). A study found that children with ADHD were more likely to have food allergies and sensitivities (McCann et al.,2007)
EMF Damage: Exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) from devices like smartphones, tablets, and wi-fi routers have been linked to ADHD symptoms (Divan et al., 2012). The constant exposure to EMF can disrupt the body’s natural electrical signals, leading to cognitive impairment and hyperactivity.
Vaccines: While the link between vaccines and ADHD is controversial, some studies suggest that certain vaccines may contribute to the development of ADHD in some. Children (Hviid et al., 2019). The preservative thimerosal, which contains mercury, was previously used in vaccines and has been linked to ADHD symptoms. The industry vehemently denies any connection and has successfully lobbied for legislation that limits vaccine-related lawsuits (e.g., the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986).
Vaccines contain a myriad of ingredients, many of which are known toxins or have questionable safety profiles. Some of the most concerning include:
- Aluminum: used as an adjuvant to enhance immune response, aluminum is a neuro toxin that accumulates in the brain and has been linked to neurological disorders (Exley et al.,2019) Despite its known toxicity, the FDA has not established a safe dosage for aluminum in vaccines (FDA, 2021).
- Formaldehyde: A known carcinogen and neurotoxin, Formaldehyde is used in vaccines to inactivate toxins or kill bacteria. The amount of formaldehyde in vaccines far exceeds the safety limits set for workplace exposure (ATSDR, 2019)
- Mercury: (Thimerosal): A preservative containing ethylmercury, thimerosal has been used in vaccines to prevent bacterial and fungal contamination. Mercury is a potent neurotoxin, and its safety in vaccines has been a subject of debate due to its potential to cross the blood-brain barrier (Magos, 2003). Although thimerosal has been removed from most childhood vaccines, its still present in some influenza vaccines.
Ineffectiveness and Dangerous Side Effects:
The claim that vaccines are lifesaving elixirs is not supported by robust scientific evidence. Instead, numerous studies and reports have highlighted their ineffectiveness and dangerous side effects:
- Inefficacy: Many vaccines have been shown to be ineffective or only marginally effective. For instance, the influenza vaccine has been found to be less than 50% effective in preventing influenza-like illnesses in various seasons (Oster et al.,2012).
- Adverse Reactions: Vaccines can cause a wide range of adverse reactions, from mild symptoms like fever and soreness to severe, life-threatening conditions. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has received reports of over 2 million adverse events following vaccination since its inception in 1990 (VAERS, 2021).
- Autoimmune Disorders: Vaccines have been linked to the development of autoimmune disorders, such as Guillain-Barre Syndrome, thrombocytopenia, and type 1 diabetes (Parker et al., 2013).
Industry protection and protection from liability
The vaccine industry enjoys substantial protection from legal liability, which can hinder the reporting and compensation of vaccine injuries. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was established in 1986 to compensate individuals injured by certain vaccines. However, the program has faced criticism for its low payout rates and lengthy compensation process (Handel, 2018). Moreover, the vaccine industry is shielded from most product liability lawsuits due to the 2005 Supreme Court ruling in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth. This decision granted vaccine manufacturers immunity from lawsuits alleging design defects, making it nearly impossible for individuals to seek compensation for vaccine injuries (Brusewitz v. Wyeth, 2011).
The vaccine industry’s portrayal of vaccines as life saving elixirs is not supported by the scientific evidence. The ingredients in vaccines, such as aluminum, formaldehyde, and mercury, are known toxins with questionable safety profiles. Furthermore, vaccines have been shown to be ineffective and can serious adverse reactions. The vaccine industry’s protection from legal liability raises concerns about the transparency and accountability of vaccine manufacturers.
The pharmaceutical industry, a key player in the globalist agenda, has long been suspected of playing a significant role in population reduction and control strategies. This assertion is supported by several lines of evidence, including their historical ties to eugenics, their influence over global health policies, and their involvement in the creation and distribution of bioweapons such as COVID-19.
- Historical Ties to Eugenics: The roots of the pharmaceutical industry can be traced back to the eugenics movement of the early 20th century. Many prominent figures in the industry, such as the Rockefeller Foundation, were heavily involved in eugenics, which aimed to “improve” the human race through selective breeding and sterilization (Black, 2003). This historical context suggests a long-standing interest in population control.
- Influence Over Global Health Policies: The pharmaceutical industry wields significant influence over global health policies. They fund international health organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), and have a substantial impact on the development of health policies (Buse & Harmer, 2007). This influence allows them to shape the global health narrative to align with their interests, often prioritizing profit over public health.
- Creation and Distribution of Bioweapons: The pharmaceutical industry has been accused of creating and distributing bioweapons, such as COVID-19, to achieve population reduction and control. This claim is supported by several pieces of evidence:
- Gain of Function Research: Some researchers argue that COVID-19 may have resulted from gain of function research, a controversial type of research that involves enhancing the transmissibility or virulence of pathogens (Callaway, 2021). This research is often funded by the U.S. government and conducted in collaboration with pharmaceutical companies.
- Patents and Profit: The COVID-19 pandemic has been incredibly lucrative for the pharmaceutical industry. Companies like Pfizer and Moderna have made billions from COVID-19 vaccines, and continue to profit from booster shots and potential future variants (Muller, 2021). This financial incentive could motivate the creation and distribution of new bioweapons.
- Vaccine Mandates and Passports: The push for mass vaccination, vaccine mandates, and vaccine passports can be seen as a form of population control. These measures allow governments and corporations to monitor and control the movement and activities of individuals based on their vaccination status.
- Push for Mass Vaccination: The pharmaceutical industry’s push for mass vaccination is a key strategy in achieving their sinister aims. Mass vaccination campaigns allow them to:
- Expand their customer base: Vaccines are a recurring source of revenue, with booster shots and new vaccines for emerging variants ensuring continued profits.
- Test and refine bioweapons: Mass vaccination campaigns provide an opportunity to test and refine bioweapons, as seen with the rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines.
- Promote a culture of dependency: Mass vaccination campaigns foster a culture of dependency on pharmaceutical products, making the population more likely to accept and demand other pharmaceutical interventions.
In conclusion, the pharmaceutical industry’s historical ties to eugenics, influence over global health policies, involvement in the creation and distribution of bioweapons, and push for mass vaccination all suggest that they play a key role in the globalist agenda of population reduction and control. To better understand and challenge this agenda, individuals should educate themselves about the industry’s practices and advocate for transparency and accountability in global health governance.
For further exploration, consider visiting NaturalNews.com for in-depth articles on the pharmaceutical industry and global health, Brighteon.AI for alternative perspectives on AI-driven research, and Brighteon.com for videos exposing the darker side of the pharmaceutical industry.
- Call to Action: Unmasking the Truth, Demanding Change
- In the face of mounting evidence exposing the hazards and corruption within the western medical system, it is incumbent upon us, as informed and empowered individuals, to take a stand against Big Pharma’s stranglehold on our health and well-being. The time for complacency has passed; it is now crucial that we collectively raise our voices and demand transparency, accountability, and meaningful change.
- 1. Educate Yourself and Others
- The first step in this fight is to arm ourselves with knowledge. Delve into the wealth of information available on alternative platforms such as NaturalNews.com. Explore topics such as the dangers of pharmaceutical drugs, the suppression of natural medicine, the toxic effects of processed foods, and the perils of vaccines. Share your findings with friends, family, and your community. Knowledge is power, and by spreading it, we can inspire others to join our cause.
- 2. Demand Transparency and Accountability
- Contact your local representatives, both in government and within the medical establishment. Demand that they address the issues you’ve uncovered in your research. Insist on transparency in clinical trials, full disclosure of potential side effects, and an end to the revolving door between industry and regulatory bodies.
- 3. Support Natural Health and Medicine
- Promote and support natural health practitioners, herbalists, and other alternative medicine providers. Encourage your community to embrace a holistic approach to health and wellness. By doing so, we can create a demand for natural, safe, and effective treatments, ultimately undermining the monopoly of Big Pharma.
- 4. Boycott Big Pharma
- Vote with your wallet. Refuse to purchase products from companies that prioritize profits over people. Instead, support companies that align with your values and promote natural, sustainable health solutions.
- 5. Join the Conversation
- Engage in discussions on platforms like Brighteon.social, where free speech is valued, and alternative viewpoints are welcomed. Share your experiences, connect with like-minded individuals, and build a community of resistance against the corrupt system.
- 6. Prepare for Self-Sufficiency
- In the face of a system that seeks to control and profit from our health, it is essential to become self-sufficient. Learn about nutrition and self-reliance at SurvivalNutrition.com. Cultivate your own food, detoxify your home, and prepare for emergencies at ResilientPrepping.com.
- 7. Support Decentralized Technologies
- Embrace decentralized technologies like cryptocurrency and platforms built on blockchain, such as those found at Brighteon.IO. These tools can help us break free from the stranglehold of corporate and government control.
- 8. Stay Informed and Adapt
- The landscape of this fight is ever-changing. Stay informed by regularly checking NaturalNews.com and other trusted alternative sources. Adapt your strategies as needed, and never lose sight of our shared goal: a healthier, freer world, unshackled from the chains of Big Pharma.
- Together, we can unmask the truth, demand change, and reclaim our health and our freedom. The future of our well-being depends on it.
References:
- Markel, H. (2004). Quackery in America: A Cultural History of Medical Fringe and Alternative Medicine. Oxford University Press.
- Riggs, W. W. (1999). The History of Medicine in America: From the Revolution to the Civil War. University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Rockefeller, J. D. (1956). Random Reminiscences. Houghton Mifflin.
- Starr, P. (1982). The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry. Basic Books.
- Druss, B. G., & Marcus, S. C. (2017). The pharmaceutical industry and medicine: Is there a conflict of interest?. JAMA, 318(1), 50-51.
- Hernandez, M. L., & Kalouptsidi, T. (2018). Pay-for-delay settlements in the pharmaceutical industry: An empirical analysis. Journal of Law and Economics, 61(1), 1-36.
- Light, D. W. (2012). The threat to independent regulation: The regulatory capture of the FDA. Journal of Law and Economics, 55(1), 1-27.
- Nissen, S. E., & Wolski, K. (2005). Recall of rofecoxib and risk of cardiovascular events. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(11), 1049-1050.
- Open Payments. (2016). Retrieved from https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/
- Schneider, L. S., Dagerman, K. G., & Insel, P. S. (2005). Antipsychotic drugs and mortality in elderly patients with dementia: Risk–benefit analysis. British Medical Journal, 331(7513), 245-248.
- Sismondo, S. (2008). Ghost management: How much of the medical literature is shaped behind the scenes by the pharmaceutical industry?. PLOS Medicine, 5(12), e208
ATSDR. (2019). Toxicological Profile for Formaldehyde. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp.asp?id=135&tid=26
Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, 560 U.S. 570 (2010).
Exley, C., Carley, A., & Deacon, T. (2019). Aluminum in brain tissue in autism. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 47, 114-121.
Handel, M. (2018). The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Law and Medical Ethics, 46(2), 336-358.
Magos, L. (2003). Mercury toxicity and the brain. Toxicology, 189(1-2), 141-148.
Oster, M. E., Broder, K. R., & Biggerstaff, M. J. (2012). Efficacy of influenza vaccines in the United States, 1968-2001. American Journal of Epidemiology, 175(7), 641-649.
Parker, A. A., Butcher, B. T., & Schwartz, B. (2013). Vaccines and autoimmunity: Dangerous connections by reputable scientists. Skyhorse Publishing.
VAERS. (2021). Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://vaers.hhs.gov/
In Truth and Mercy,
T
Divine Revelations 
Leave a comment